Butler v. Floyd
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Jenkins, Justice.
1. “Equity will not interfere with the regular administration of estates . . upon application of any person interested in the estate [except] where there is danger of loss or other injury to his interests.” Code, § 37-403. “To authorize such interference the facts must very clearly show there is a good reason for so doing.” Moody v. Ellerbie, 36 Ga. 666; Mayo v. Keaton, 54 Ga. 496; Powell v. Quinn, 49 Ga. 523; Jones v. Parker, 60 Ga. 500 (3), 504; Thompson v. Orser, 105 Ga. 482 (30 S. E. 626); McArthur v. Jordan, 139 Ga. 304, 307 (77 S. E. 150); Morrison v. McFarland, 147 Ga.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Morrison v. McFarlandSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
- Lester v. StephensSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Atlanta Railway & Power Co. v. Atlanta Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Emmett & Co. v. DekleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Powell v. QuinnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1873
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Abercrombie v. HairSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
- Terry v. FickettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1945
- Astin v. CardenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Saliba v. SalibaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1946
- Furr v. JordanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.