Legal Opinion

Crowe v. Kell

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided November 1, 1893No. 976PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From the Warren Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtLotz, J.

The first assignment of error discussed by appellant is, that the trial court erred in overruling the demurrer to the third paragraph of the complaint. This paragraph, in brief, alleges that the appellant, being the owner of certain real estate, leased portions thereof, at two different times, to the appellee, to be planted in corn, and when mature it was agreed that the corn should be divided equally in the field; that, when said crop had matured, the appellant took possession of the whole thereof, excluded the appellee therefrom, and converted five hundred bushels of appellee’s corn to his…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Brower v. NellisIndiana Court of Appeals · 1893

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nickey v. ZonkerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Block v. SwangoIndiana Court of Appeals · 1894
  3. Comer v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Court of Appeals · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API