Legal Opinion
Hapka v. Paquin Farms
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided August 3, 1990No. C4-88-410Published
1Opinion of the Court
458 N.W.2d 683 (1990)
Conrad HAPKA, individually, Brian Hapka, individually, and Conrad and Brian Hapka, Petitioners, Appellants,
v.
PAQUIN FARMS, et al., Gust Hangsleben and State of Minnesota, Department of Agriculture, Respondents.
No. C4-88-410.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
August 3, 1990.
Robert W. Wattson, Mark E. O'Boyle, Zelle & Larson, Minneapolis, for appellants.
Dennis M. Sobolik, Roger C. Malm, Brink, Sobolik, Severson, Vroom & Malm, P.A., Hallock, for Paquin Farms.
Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Paul A. Strandberg, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, for State of Minn.
Donald Leonard,…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- East River Steamship Corp. v. Transamerica Delaval Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Seely v. White Motor Co.California Supreme Court · 1965
- Spring Motors Distributors, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1985
- Hoff v. KemptonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- McCormack v. Hankscraft CompanySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.