Legal Opinion

McNeny v. Radford

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 13, 1934No. 1253PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FUNDERBURK, Justice.

McNeny & McNeny by this suit seek to re cover of J. M. Radford commissions claimed to be due under a contract which was subsequently modified. The original contract was as follows:

“McNeny & McNeny “Realtors
“Chain Store Leasing
“City Abilene, Texas, Population 30,000 Trade Territory .500,000 Street and No. Northwest Corner Pine & Third Sts. Term 30 yrs. Lease Begins Upon completion of building Lease Price $13,000 gross 10 yrs; $14,000 gross 10 yrs; $15,000 gross 10 yrs.
“Size of building 50 x 140 feet Size of lot 50 x 140 feet
“No of stories-Alley Yes
“Size of basement None…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hamburger & Dreyling v. ThomasTexas Supreme Court · 1910
  2. West Realty & Investment Co. v. HiteTexas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  3. Harrell v. ZimplemanTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Hutton v. SherrardMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Joseph v. BostickTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Radford v. McNenyTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Del Andersen & Associates v. JonesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1975
  3. Stark v. BallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API