Commonwealth v. Fernandez
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Spaeth, J.,
This is an appeal from the denial after hearing of relief under the Post Conviction Hearing Act. Appellant sought relief in the form of a new trial on the ground that there was new evidence that the witnesses against him at his trial had perjured themselves.
Appellant was convicted of burglary and of robbery while armed with an accomplice. The witnesses against him were two co-defendants who had pleaded guilty. At the PCHA hearing appellant testified that both these witnesses had recanted and said they had perjured themselves in return for favored treatment, but when he…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Commonwealth v. MostellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Commonwealth v. ColemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Commonwealth v. ArmbrusterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Robert Hawthorne, Inc. v. County Investigating Grand JurySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. ScullSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LonerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Ferrell v. WallSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
- Commonwealth v. KayeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
- Com. v. Johnson, I.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019