Commonwealth v. Mosteller
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Roberts,
This appeal requires that we consider the value of a prosecutrix’s recantation subsequent to trial, when her testimony at trial was the sole evidence upon which the Commonwealth depended to support the indictments against appellant for various sex crimes. We believe that on the record before us a new trial is necessary so that a new jury may pass on the prosecutrix’s credibility in light of subsequent events.
Appellant was convicted of incest, statutory rape, and corrupting the morals of a minor in a trial before a jury on June 12 and 13, 1968. The Commonwealth’s…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. CollinsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Wedmore v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1957
- Commonwealth v. KrickSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
- Commonwealth v. ColemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Commonwealth v. ScullSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1962
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by82 opinions
- Commonwealth v. D'AmatoSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
- Commonwealth v. LonerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Commonwealth v. Small, E., Aplt.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Commonwealth v. CastroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
77 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.