Commonwealth v. Kaye
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Spaeth, J.,
Appellant, an osteopath, was convicted after a trial by jury of three offenses under the Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act: 1 trafficking in dangerous or narcotic drugs ; 2 prescription to a person known to be a habitual user; 3 and prescription without a physical examination. 4
On July 13, 1971, George Gariti went to appellant’s office in Coraopolis, Allegheny County, and asked appellant to issue a prescription for Numorphan. This was a very potent pain killer, usually only prescribed for use by terminal cancer patients. Appellant refused to write the prescription unless…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Commonwealth v. AgieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Commonwealth v. WidemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth v. MostellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
- Commonwealth v. ColemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
- Commonwealth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Commonwealth v. StricklerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- Commonwealth v. FawcettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. StricklerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978