Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Kaye

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 27, 1975No. Appeal, 375PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Spaeth, J.,

Appellant, an osteopath, was convicted after a trial by jury of three offenses under the Drug, Device and Cosmetic Act: 1 trafficking in dangerous or narcotic drugs ; 2 prescription to a person known to be a habitual user; 3 and prescription without a physical examination. 4

On July 13, 1971, George Gariti went to appellant’s office in Coraopolis, Allegheny County, and asked appellant to issue a prescription for Numorphan. This was a very potent pain killer, usually only prescribed for use by terminal cancer patients. Appellant refused to write the prescription unless…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AgieSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Commonwealth v. WidemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Commonwealth v. MostellerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  4. Commonwealth v. ColemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1970
  5. Commonwealth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StricklerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. Commonwealth v. FawcettSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Commonwealth v. StricklerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API