Legal Opinion
Friedgood v. Keane
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided June 14, 1999No. CV 94-5894(ADS)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION AND ORDER
SPATT, District Judge.
The pro se habeas corpus petitioner, Charles E. Friedgood (“Friedgood” or the “petitioner”), filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, in which he claimed the following six grounds for relief: (1) the prosecution failed to prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt; (2) prosecutorial misconduct; (3) the trial court erroneously refused to admit certain defense testimony to refute the prosecutor’s improper statements concerning the petitioner’s motive; (4) the trial court erroneously refused to instruct the…
2Cases cited60 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Coleman v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Huber v. SchriverDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2001
- Chestnut v. LaMannaDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2019
- Fulcher v. GrahamDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2022
- Rodriguez v. SabourinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003