Legal Opinion

William K. Haney v. Buford R. Burgess, Sheriff Morgan County, Alabama and Charles A. Graddick, Attorney General for the State of Alabama

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided September 5, 1986No. 86-7197PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Non-Argument Calendar.

1Per curiam

This appeal raises the question of whether it violates the double jeopardy clause to retry a defendant whose criminal conviction was reversed because of improper venue. We hold that reversal because of improper venue is not the same as reversal for insufficient evidence to support a conviction, which would bar a retrial, and that retrial is permitted here. We therefore affirm the district court’s denial of a writ of habeas corpus to this state petitioner.

William Haney, a psychiatrist practicing in Morgan County, Alabama, was convicted in Montgomery County Circuit Court of multiple counts of…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Wade v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1949

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. Dimitar PetlechkovCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
  2. Jones v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000
  3. People v. CortezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  4. People v. CortezSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  5. United States v. AyoDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API