Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

People v. Cortez

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 18, 1987No. 85SC190Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

VOLLACK, Justice,

specially concurring in part and dissenting in part;

I concur in part and dissent in part. Because I believe that this court should address the double jeopardy question mentioned by the majority in footnote 4, I respectfully dissent from that conclusion in the majority opinion. We granted certiora-ri on the issue, it was thoroughly addressed in the briefs submitted by the parties, and in the interest of judicial economy I believe the issue should be decided.

I

I agree with the majority that the facts of this case, as established by a careful review of the record, reveal no…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Bryan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
  3. People v. LybargerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1985
  4. People v. BrassfieldSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
  5. Pollard v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API