Legal Opinion
Winks v. Feeney Oil Co., Inc.
District Court, C.D. Illinois
Decided February 21, 1990No. 88-3305PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RICHARD MILLS, District Judge:
PMPA revisited.
The Court has before it motions for partial summary judgment filed in the two cases comprising this consolidated action: Winks v. Feeney Oil, Inc., 88-3305, and Feeney Oil Co., Inc. v. Winks, 89-3052. (Because the parties are in opposite alignment in the two cases, we shall refer to them as Feeney Oil and Winks, rather than by their respective party designations.)
This case requires us to return to the Petroleum Marketing Practices Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2801-2805 (PMPA); the last time we ventured into this territory was in Thompson v. Amoco Oil…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Skelly Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Improvement Company v. MunsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State Oil Co. v. KhanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1993
- Texaco Refining and Marketing Inc. v. DavisDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1993
- Baker v. Amoco Oil Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1990
- Interstate Petroleum Corp. v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2000
- Beck Oil Co. v. Texaco Refining & Marketing, Inc.District Court, C.D. Illinois · 1993
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.