Legal Opinion
Bergstresser v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided September 21, 1970No. 1 CA-IC 392PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAIRE, Judge.
The sole issue in this Workmen’s Compensation proceeding is whether, under the statutory law as it existed prior to January 1, 1969, an injured workman awarded temporary total disability benefits at 65% of average monthly wage is entitled under the terms of A.R.S. § 23-1045, subsec. A to (1) an additional $10 per month for each of his dependents, or (2) a single additional $10 per month for all of. his dependents, regardless of their number.
The petitioning claimant was industrially injured in 1967. He has a dependent wife and five dependent children. The award of the Industrial…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Goodyear Aircraft Corp. v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1945
- Nicholson v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1953
- Long v. DickArizona Supreme Court · 1959
- Dunlap v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1961
3Cited by6 opinions
- Prigosin v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1976
- Putz v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
- Parise v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
- Padilla v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
- Meno's construction/aig v. ReyesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.