Legal Opinion

Mannix v. Kulongoski

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1996No. SC S42595, S42596 and S42572Published

1Opinion of the Court

918 P.2d 839 (1996)

323 Or. 485

Kevin L. MANNIX and Susan M. Marshall, Petitioners,

v.

Theodore R. KULONGOSKI, Attorney General, State of Oregon, Respondent, and

Tom Hull, Debbie Garman and Janet Webster, Intervenors.

Tom HULL, Debbie Garman and Janet Webster, Petitioners,

v.

Theodore KULONGOSKI, Attorney General, State of Oregon, Respondent.

Henry KANE, Petitioner,

v.

Theodore R. KULONGOSKI, Attorney General, State of Oregon, Respondent.

SC S42595, S42596 and S42572.

Supreme Court of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted October 10, 1995.

Decided July 5, 1996.

Kevin L. Mannix, Salem, argued the cause and filed the…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. HenryOregon Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Rooney v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. City of Portland v. TidymanOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Fred Meyer, Inc. v. RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Mannix v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1996

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API