Legal Opinion
Sherman & Hemstreet, Inc. v. Cincinnati Insurance
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided March 29, 2004No. S03G1190Published
1Opinion of the Court
594 S.E.2d 648 (2004)
277 Ga. 734
SHERMAN & HEMSTREET, INC.
v.
CINCINNATI INSURANCE CO.
No. S03G1190.
Supreme Court of Georgia.
March 29, 2004.
Reconsideration Denied April 13, 2004.
Warlick, Tritt, Stebbins & Hall, Augusta, William B. Warlick, for Appellant.
Howard, Clark & Mercer, Douglasville, Glen W. Clark Jr., for Appellee.
Powell, Goldstein, Frazer & Murphy, Atlanta, Linda G. Birchall, for amicus curiae.
SEARS, Presiding Justice.
Certiorari was granted to consider whether the Court of Appeals correctly construed an insurance policy's provisions governing the limit of insurance applicable to coverage…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Claussen v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1989
- Columbia Heights Motors, Inc. v. Allstate Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
- Ryan v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1992
- Jefferson Pilot Life Insurance v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1991
- A.B.S. Clothing Collection, Inc. v. Home InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.