Legal Opinion

Matthews v. State

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided March 18, 1997No. 22257PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PERRY, Judge.

Terrence James Matthews appeals from the district court’s order dismissing his application for post-conviction relief. Matthews claims the district court erred in denying his motion for summary judgment and in granting the state’s motion to dismiss. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

I

BACKGROUND

In June 1991, a jury found Matthews guilty of two counts of lewd conduct with a minor, and two counts of sexual abuse of a child. Matthews received four concurrent sentences of fifteen years, with five-year minimum periods of confinement. Matthews filed an I.C.R. 35 motion for…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Aragon v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Roman v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994
  4. Baruth v. GardnerIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. G&M Farms v. Funk Irrigation Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1991

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. ConnerIdaho Court of Appeals · 2020
  2. Terrence James Matthews v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API