Chatman v. WeDriveU, Inc
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 PRECIOUS CHATMAN, Case No. 3:22-cv-04849-WHO; Plaintiff, 3:22-cv-04850-WHO 8 9 v. GRANTING MOTION FOR PARTIAL JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS 10 WEDRIVEU, INC, AND GRANTING IN PART MOTION TO REMAND Defendant. 11 Re: Dkt. No. 18 (case no. 22-cv-04849) 12 Dkt. Nos. 16, 22 (case no. 22-cv-04859) 13 14 Plaintiff Precious Chatman works for defendant company WeDriveU, a shuttle 15 transportation service based in the Bay Area. She brought a putative class action and a claim 16 arising under California’s Private Attorney General Act…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.