Legal Opinion

Chatman v. WeDriveU, Inc

District Court, N.D. California

Decided October 28, 2022No. 3:22-cv-04849Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 PRECIOUS CHATMAN, Case No. 3:22-cv-04849-WHO; Plaintiff, 3:22-cv-04850-WHO 8 9 v. GRANTING MOTION FOR PARTIAL JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS 10 WEDRIVEU, INC, AND GRANTING IN PART MOTION TO REMAND Defendant. 11 Re: Dkt. No. 18 (case no. 22-cv-04849) 12 Dkt. Nos. 16, 22 (case no. 22-cv-04859) 13 14 Plaintiff Precious Chatman works for defendant company WeDriveU, a shuttle 15 transportation service based in the Bay Area. She brought a putative class action and a claim 16 arising under California’s Private Attorney General Act…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  4. United States v. Donald Lawrence Ritchie, Heather Horner, Claimant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  5. Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API