Legal Opinion

Pinnacle Bank v. Villa

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 2004No. 03-234PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEHMAN, Justice.

[¶ 1] This case comes before this court as two certified questions from the District Court, Fifth Judicial District, State of Wyoming. We are asked to consider whether a city ordinance addressing the removal of snow and ice establishes the applicable duty of care or whether Wyoming’s common law regarding the natural accumulation of snow and ice applies. We are additionally asked to consider whether the State of Wyoming is to be included in the comparative fault analysis even though the State is immune from suit in these circumstances.

ISSUES

[¶ 2] The certified questions are:

1.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Distad v. CubinWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Watts v. HolmesWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Sherman v. Platte CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Eiselein v. K-Mart, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Kalman v. Western Union Telegraph CompanyWyoming Supreme Court · 1964

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Zaldivar v. PrickettSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
  2. Prokop v. HockhalterWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Preston v. Marathon Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  4. RB, Jr., an infant, by and through his next friends, Robby & Corrina Brown v. Big Horn County School District No. 3Wyoming Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Ocasio v. Federal Express Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API