Legal Opinion

Prokop v. Hockhalter

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided June 28, 2006No. 05-170PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURKE, Justice.

[T1] This case comes before this Court as two certified questions from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. The first question asks us to consider whether the two-year statute of limitations contained in Wyo. Stat. Ann. § 1-8-107(a) (LexisNexis 2005) applies to actions against licensed outfitters and professional hunting guides. If we conclude that the two-year limitations period does apply, the second question asks us to consider whether it applies to both contract and tort claims.

ISSUES

[12] The certified questions are as follows:

1. Wyo. Stat. Ann. §…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Witherspoon v. Sides Const. Co., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Reinke Manufacturing Co. v. HayesNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Murphy v. Spelts-Schultz Lumber Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Mills v. GarlowWyoming Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Richardson Associates v. Lincoln-Devore, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1991

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Bylin v. BillingsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
  2. Coffinberry v. Board of County CommissionersWyoming Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Preston v. Marathon Oil Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2012
  4. Seneca Insurance Company, Inc., a foreign corporationWyoming Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Hall v. Park CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API