Legal Opinion

Brawner v. Bussell

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 23, 1935No. 24050PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. The right of a mother, under the Civil Code of 1910, § 4424, to recover for the tortious homicide of her child upon whom she is dependent and who contributes to her support, iS purely statutory, *844and is not a right at common law. Her right is dependent upon an actual dependency upon the child for support and the actual contribution by the child at the time to the mother’s support. Smith v. Hatcher, 102 Ga. 158 (29 S. E. 162) ; Clay v. Central Railroad &c. Co., 84 Ga. 345 (10 S. E. 967) ; Kent v. Consumers Co., 47 Ga. App. 213 (170 S. E. 202); W. & A. Railroad Co. v. Anderson, 34 Ga. App.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fuller v. InmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  2. Clay v. Central Railroad & Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1890
  3. Smith v. HatcherSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
  4. Western & Atlantic Railroad v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1925
  5. Kent v. Consumers Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1933

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Wilson v. PollardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  2. Clements v. PollardCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  3. Hogan v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1952
  4. Arteaga v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
  5. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. PattersonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API