Legal Opinion
Travelers Indemnity Co. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided April 2, 2008No. 05-1252CPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
LETTOW, Judge.
This surety ease has returned to the court because somewhat unusual circumstances have arisen. Defendant has filed a motion for relief from judgment, relying on Rule 60(b)(5) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). The motion is predicated on the fact that the judgment previously entered by this court in this surety case awarding $32,718.99 to plaintiff (“Travelers”), see Travelers Indem. Co. v. United States, 72 Fed.Cl. 56, 68 (2006), has been satisfied through payment of a claim by plaintiff in a bankruptcy proceeding.
BACKGROUND
Judgm…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- United States v. Boch Oldsmobile, Inc., Boch Toyota, Inc., and Ernest J. BochCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Eugene B. Kassman v. The American University. Appeal of Lloyd UltanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. United Pacific InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1998
- Planet Corporation v. George D. Sullivan, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Iap Worldwide Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019