Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Insurance v. United Pacific Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided August 24, 1998No. 96-4210PublishedCited by 78 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURPHY, Circuit Judge.
United Pacific Insurance Company and Reliance Insurance Company (“Defendants”) appeal the district court’s denial of their Rule 60(b) motions seeking relief from judgment. Defendants also challenge the fairness of the proceedings on remand from the previous appeal of this case, arguing the district court’s procedures prevented a fair and accurate computation of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s (“FDIC”) net recovery from the settlement of a legal malpractice suit against a third party. Exercising jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291, this court reverses…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- In Re: The Prudential Insurance Company Of America Sales Practices LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- Standard Oil Co. of Cal. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Cashner v. Freedom Stores, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Marta M. MOTLEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. MARATHON OIL COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by78 opinions
- Servants of the Paraclete v. DoesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Husky Ventures, Inc. v. B55 Invs., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Amoco Oil Co. v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- Centennial Archaeology, Inc. v. AECOM, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
- Foster v. HillCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1999
73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.