Legal Opinion
Heintzman v. Amalgamated Transit Union International
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 18, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2011-1456PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
EMMET G. SULLIVAN, District Judge.
On July 22, 2011, plaintiff Ronald Heintzman, proceeding pro se, filed a complaint in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia against defendants Amalgamated Transit Union International (“ATU”), a labor organization, and Lawrence Hanley, in his official capacity as International President of ATU (“President”). Plaintiffs complaint asserts a breach of contract claim against defendants for violation of the ATU Constitution and General Laws (“ATU Constitution”). Plaintiff, who served as International Executive Vice President and then…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Allis-Chalmers Corp. v. LueckSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Avco Corp. v. Aero Lodge No. 735, International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Smith v. Evening News Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Berry v. Coastal International Security, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Hudson v. Am. Fed'n of Gov't Emps.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2018
- District No. 1, Pacific Coast District, Marine Engineers Beneficial Association, Afl-Cio v. American Maritime OfficersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Hudson, Jr. v. American Federation of Government EmployeesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018