Legal Opinion

Milwaukee Electric Railway & Light Co. v. City of Milwaukee

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1932PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.

The question for determination is whether the plaintiff or the defendant city should bear the expense of the removal and relocation of the plaintiff’s electric conduits made necessary by the construction of a new water main in the intersection mentioned. In order that this controversy may be understood we deem it necessary to recite fully the facts.

On October 7, 1889, the common council of the city of Milwaukee passed an ordinance which purported to grant to Edison Electric Illuminating Company the right and authority “to construct and maintain in the streets, alleys, tunnels and public…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re Board of Rapid Transit RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  2. City of Los Angeles v. Los Angeles Gas & Electric Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
  3. Eau Claire Dells Improvement Co. v. City of Eau ClaireWisconsin Supreme Court · 1920
  4. Litchfield Construction Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1926
  5. Piper v. City of MadisowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1909

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Taber v. City of Benton HarborMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. Charles Ind Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1954
  3. City of Milwaukee v. Public Service CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Wisconsin Power & Light Co. v. GerkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  5. Public Service Corp. v. Marathon CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API