Legal Opinion
State Compensation Fund v. Joe
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided December 18, 1975No. 1 CA-IC 1224 and 1225PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STEVENS, Judge, Retired. 2
We have decided to consolidate 1 CA-IC 1224 (the Cora Mae Joe claim) and 1 CA-IC 1225 (the Fannie Harvey Dick claim) because the issues presented to the Court are identical.
The first issue, and the main thrust of both cases, is whether a widow may recover compensation under the Workmen’s Compensation Act when the workman died from a disease that is defined within the Occupational Disease Disability Act. 3 If the answer to the first issue is in the negative, then the issue of whether an Arizona employer is liable for compensation when the employee has worked…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Murray v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1960
- Pierce v. Phelps Dodge Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1933
- Dunlap v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1961
- Reilly v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Mead v. American Smelting & Refining CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Department of Labor & Industries v. FankhauserWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Nelson v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978
- Fry's Food Stores v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1994
- Begay v. Kerr-McGee Corp.District Court, D. Arizona · 1980
- American Ins. Co. v. Indus. Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.