Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Equitable Life Assurance Society

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 10, 1935No. Docket No. 32, Calendar No. 38,520PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

From tbe latter part of 1930 until about September 1, 1932, plaintiff, Albert C. Boyd, was employed by tbe United States Rubber Company. He was then laid off on account of slack work. He again worked for the same employer for a period of three days about tbe middle of December, 1932; but tbe work be was then required to do was too bard for him and bis employment ceased. The Equitable Life Assurance Society of tbe United States, defendant herein, was the insurer under a group policy covering certain employees of tbe United States Rubber Company. On April 1, 1931, defendant issued to plaintiff…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Boozer v. . Assurance SocietySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  2. Boozer ex rel. Boozer v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wright v. Prudential Insurance of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
  2. Bucher v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of United StatesUtah Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Lukaswiecz v. General American Life Ins.Michigan Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API