Legal Opinion
Bucher v. Equitable Life Assur. Soc. of United States
Utah Supreme Court
Decided December 18, 1936No. 5687PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FOLLAND, Justice.
Plaintiff sued to recover disability benefits claimed to be due under the total and permanent disability provision of a policy of group life insurance issued by the defendant society to the Union Pacific Railroad Company and its affiliated companies, including the Oregon Short Line Railroad Company by which the plaintiff had been employed. The case was tried to a jury. From a verdict in favor of plaintiff, defendant appeals. The policy in suit contained the following provisions:
“This policy is issued in place of group life insurance policies numbered 5170023; 5170024;…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. of NY v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Illinois Bankers' Life Association v. ByasseeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925
- Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York v. WheatleyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- Gibson v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesUtah Supreme Court · 1934
- Shipp v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1927
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Vaughn B. Hunter v. Fireman's Fund Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1971
- Bench v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesUtah Supreme Court · 1968