Schudel v. Helbing
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial. John Hunt, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Otto tum Suden, and tum Suden & tum Suden, for Appellant.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is an action brought to recover damages for the malicious prosecution of certain civil suits against the plaintiff maintained or instigated by the defendant herein. The facts out of which said suits arose were these: In the year 1906 the plaintiff herein rented from the defendant herein certain premises through Louis Helbing, the defendant’s father and agent, the agreement being that a written lease of the premises at a rental of thirty dollars per month for a three-year term was to be drawn up and executed. After the plaintiff herein had gone into possession of said premises…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Schermerhorn v. Los Angeles Pacific RailroadCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1912
3Cited by3 opinions
- Sessions v. Pacific Improvement Co.California Court of Appeal · 1922
- Reay v. ReayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Vickers v. VickersNevada Supreme Court · 1921