Legal Opinion

Graffia v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 17, 2014No. Nos. 13-3755, 13-3756, 13-3757, 13-3758, 13-3759PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*475ORDER

In these consolidated appeals, the Graf-fia family — Paul and Marilynne, along with their adult son David and his wife Amy— challenge the Tax Court’s ruling that collectively they have a tax deficiency of $228,469 for tax years 2005 through 2007 and owe a $44,693 penalty. The deficiency principally results from flow-through losses that Marilynne, David, and Amy attributed to Preferred Capital Services Corporation, an S corporation operated by Paul and owned by Marilynne and David. After a trial, the Tax Court found that these losses are based on sham transactions. The court also…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Welch v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Indopco, Inc. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Mejia v. Cook County, Ill.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  4. Grove Fresh Distributors, Inc. v. John Labatt, Ltd. And American Citrus Products Corp., Appeal Of: John P. MessinaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  5. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Liudas Kairys, Defendant-Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Northern California Small Business Assistants Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2019
  2. Northern California Small Business Assistants Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API