United States v. Davis
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Before FULTON, COHEN and NAUGHTON, Appellate Military Judges. PER CURIAM:
Appellant was convicted, contrary to his pleas, of assault with intent to commit sodomy and communication of a threat. He now contests the findings of guilty of the first offense. He contends there is insufficient evidence that he intended to engage in forcible sodomy, that the offense of assault with intent to commit sodomy requires an intent to commit nonconsensual sodomy, and, therefore, that he is not guilty of the charged assault. We disagree.
The facts are essentially undisputed. Appellant…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. Dong Pok YipCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
- United States v. MarceyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958
3Cited by2 opinions
- United States v. RathU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
- United States v. McCrayU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1983