Legal Opinion

United States v. Davis

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided January 11, 1983No. SPCM 17725PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Before FULTON, COHEN and NAUGHTON, Appellate Military Judges. PER CURIAM:

Appellant was convicted, contrary to his pleas, of assault with intent to commit sodomy and communication of a threat. He now contests the findings of guilty of the first offense. He contends there is insufficient evidence that he intended to engage in forcible sodomy, that the offense of assault with intent to commit sodomy requires an intent to commit nonconsensual sodomy, and, therefore, that he is not guilty of the charged assault. We disagree.

The facts are essentially undisputed. Appellant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. Dong Pok YipCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Taylor v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1957
  3. United States v. MarceyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1958

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. RathU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988
  2. United States v. McCrayU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API