Legal Opinion
Melo v. Pagano
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided September 23, 2002PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*718By order dated February 16, 1999, the Supreme Court, Queens County, issued an order precluding the plaintiff from offering evidence at trial unless she responded to the defendant’s discovery demands within a certain time. Upon the plaintiffs failure to comply with the conditional order of preclusion, the defendant moved for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. In response, the plaintiff cross-moved, inter alia, to vacate her default in opposing the motion to preclude. The Supreme Court denied the motion for summary judgment and, in effect, granted the plaintiffs cross motion. We affirm.
T…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Roussodimou v. ZafiriadisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Parker v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- De Vito v. Marine Midland Bank, N. A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Gambardella v. Ortov Lighting, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Eretz Funding, Ltd. v. Shalosh AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Weller v. PaulAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Katsnelson v. ELRAC, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003