Klinesmith v. Socwell

This was a suit by the appellant against the appellee to obtain the partition of a certain lot in the city of Indianapolis, and to quiet her title to her share thereof. In her complaint the appellant alleged that she was the owner *590in fee simple of an undivided one-third part, and the appellee was the like owner of the residue of the lot in controversy.. Appellee answered specially, in a single paragraph, to which the appellant’s demurrer, for the alleged want of facts, was overruled by the court. She then replied in a single affirmative paragraph, to which reply the appellee’s demurrer, for…