Legal Opinion

Christy v. Smith

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1881No. 8493PublishedCited by 16 opinions

From the Vigo Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.

— In this case the appellee sued the appellants to obtain the partition of certain real estate, particularly described, in Vigo county. In her complaint, she alleged, in ■substance, that she was the owner in fee of the undivided one-third, and the appellant Mary L. Christy, the wife of her co-appellant, was the owner in fee of the remaining two-thirds *574of said real estate, which was held by them as tenants in common. The appellants jointly answered in two paragraphs; of which the first was a general denial of the complaint, and the second paragraph stated special matters by way of defenceto…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Co. v. SedwickIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Cutsinger v. NebekerIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Connecticut Mutual Life Ins. v. AthonIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Dodge v. PopeIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Evansville & Richmond Railroad v. MadduxIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Wolverton v. WolvertonIndiana Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Gates v. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Weaver v. AppleIndiana Supreme Court · 1897

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API