Legal Opinion

Isbell v. Stewart

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1890No. 15,495PublishedCited by 14 opinions

From tbe Noble Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

— The appellant seeks an order requiring the appellee, as administrator of the estate of Mary G. Isbell, to pay him one-third of the money received as such adminis*113trator. The appellant is the surviving husband of Mary G. Isbell, who, at the time she married the appellant, was the widow of William Lash. The money is claimed by the appellant in virtue of his rights as a surviving husband.

William Lash left surviving him seven children, the fruits of his marriage with Mary G., through whom the appellant now claims the money in controversy. No children were born to her and the appellant. At the…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Avery v. AkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Utterback v. TerhuneIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Luntz v. GreveIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Miller v. NobleIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Sims v. GayIndiana Supreme Court · 1886

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Tobin v. McClellanIndiana Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Finley v. CathcartIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Mayer v. HaggertyIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Courier-Journal Co. v. SalleeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1898
  5. Hawkins v. TaylorIndiana Supreme Court · 1891

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API