Legal Opinion

ACTION PERFORMANCE COMPANIES, INC. v. Bohbot

District Court, C.D. California

Decided March 15, 2006No. CV 05-4458 JFW(RCX)Published

1Opinion of the Court

CHAPMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.

PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO ESTABLISH CRIME-FRAUD EXCEPTION TO ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE

On February 14, 2006, plaintiffs filed a notice of motion and motion to establish the crime-fraud exception to the attorney-client privilege and the supporting declarations of David Martin and George M. Bel-field, with exhibits. On February 22, 2006, defendant Jeff Bohbot, proceeding pro se, filed an opposition to the motion. 1 On March 1, 2006, plaintiffs filed their reply. This matter is decided in Chambers, without oral argument,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Curtis R. Martin, Jr., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Roberts v. City of PalmdaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Oakes v. Halvorsen Marine Ltd.District Court, C.D. California · 1998
  4. BP Alaska Exploration, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API