ACTION PERFORMANCE COMPANIES, INC. v. Bohbot
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
CHAPMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
PROCEEDINGS: (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO ESTABLISH CRIME-FRAUD EXCEPTION TO ATTORNEY-CLIENT PRIVILEGE
On February 14, 2006, plaintiffs filed a notice of motion and motion to establish the crime-fraud exception to the attorney-client privilege and the supporting declarations of David Martin and George M. Bel-field, with exhibits. On February 22, 2006, defendant Jeff Bohbot, proceeding pro se, filed an opposition to the motion. 1 On March 1, 2006, plaintiffs filed their reply. This matter is decided in Chambers, without oral argument,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Curtis R. Martin, Jr., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Roberts v. City of PalmdaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
- Oakes v. Halvorsen Marine Ltd.District Court, C.D. California · 1998
- BP Alaska Exploration, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. Superior Court of L.A. Cty.California Court of Appeal · 1997
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.