Legal Opinion

Rumford Chemical Works v. Hygienic Chemical Co.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided April 26, 1907No. 18PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the District of New Jersey.

1Opinion of the Court

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

This is an appeal from a decree entered by the Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey dismissing, for noninfringement, a bill in equity filed by the Rumford Chemical *66Works which charged the Hygienic Chemical Company of New Jersey with infringement of a patent. The court below held there was no proof of infringement, and there is no error in its so holding, if the testimony of one Clotworthy was rightfully excluded. This excluded deposition of Clotworthy, now deceased, was taken in a suit in the Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York (135 Fed. 331…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rumford Chemical Works v. New York Baking Powder Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1904
  2. American Bridge Co. of New York v. Camden Interstate Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1904

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rumford Chemical Works v. Hygienic Chemical Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Miller v. Electro Bleaching Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API