Legal Opinion

Wedgewood Diner, Inc. v. Good

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 7, 1987No. 539PublishedCited by 27 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

The significant issue in this appeal involves application of the doctrine of election of remedies. Where the owner of a diner business has affirmed a refinancing arrangement by commencing and litigating successfully an action for damages against the agent who negotiated the transaction negligently and in breach of his fiduciary duty, may the owner thereafter disaffirm and rescind the transaction in a separate action against the other party to the transaction. We hold that he cannot and reverse the final decree which allowed rescission and restitution.

The doctrine of election of…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Aiello v. Ed Saxe Real Estate, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Emery v. Third Nat. Bank of Pbg.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Joseph Melnick Building & Loan Ass'n v. MelnickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  4. Raw v. LehnertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Pittsburgh Union Stock Yards Co. v. Pittsburgh Joint Stock Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by27 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. RockeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Umbelina v. AdamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
  3. Eigen v. Textron Lycoming Reciprocating Engine DivisionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  4. Dempsey v. Cessna Aircraft Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. McCausland v. WagnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API