Legal Opinion

S- AND B-C

Board of Immigration Appeals

Decided July 1, 1961No. 1168PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

M.ATTER OF S—AND B—C-- In EXCLUSION and DEPORTATION Proceedings A-11460920 A-10633389 Decisions by Board June 2, 1960 Decided by the Attorney General October 2, 1961 Miarepresantation- Section 212(a)(19), 1052 act—Criteria for determining ma- teriality. (1) A misrepresentation under section 212(a) (19) of the Act is material if either (A) the alien is excludable on the true facts, or (B) the misrepre- sentation tends to shut off a line of inquiry which is relevant to the alien's eligibility and which might well have resulted in a proper determination that he be excluded. (2) The same test for…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Holland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. Chaunt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. Communist Party of United States v. Subversive Activities Control Bd.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. The "Idaho."Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. United States v. Roberto Flores-RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. United States v. Rakesh HiraniCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2016
  2. Geronima Mayo v. Thomas J. Schiltgen, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  3. David Kinyua Mwongera v. Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  4. Injeti v. United States Citizenship & Immigration ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013
  5. Parlak v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API