Legal Opinion
Rivkin v. Dover Township Rent Leveling Board
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided December 8, 1994PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
D’ANNUNZIO, J.A.D.
The issue is whether defendant deprived plaintiffs of procedural due process, thereby subjecting defendant to liability for compensatory damages and counsel fees.
Galaxy Manor, a partnership, operates a mobile home park in Dover Township. In May 1990, it filed an application for a rent increase with defendant Dover Township Rent Leveling Board (Board or defendant). The application was based on major capital improvements to the park, allegedly in the amount of $59,624.96. The Board conducted hearings and rendered its decision in October…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Daniels v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Rivkin v. Dover Township Rent Leveling BoardSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1996
- Waters v. Township of GallowayNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1995
- State v. SmithNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1996