Legal Opinion

U.S. Bank and Trust Co. Case.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 2, 1933No. Appeal, 314PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

By an arrangement between the Venus Silk Hosiery Company and the Allegheny Title and Trust Company, the former conveyed certain realty to five of its stockholders, who mortgaged it to the Trust Company in the sum of $17,000, then reconveyed it to the Hosiery Company subject to the mortgage, and deposited the proceeds in the latter’s checking account with the Trust Company. Subsequently the Trust Company changed its name to that of the U. S. Bank and Trust Company, and hereinafter, for clarity’s sake, it will be called the “Bank,” whether the transaction being…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hibert v. LangSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895
  2. Kountz v. Kirkpatrick & LyonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1873
  3. Craighead v. SwartzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907
  4. Commonwealth, to Use v. CrowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1928
  5. Somerset Colliery Co. v. JohnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Koppel v. Olaf Realty Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  2. Gordon v. Anthracite Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Harr v. Bankers Securities Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  4. Commonwealth Trust Company of Pittsburgh's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Kisinger v. Pennsylvania Trust Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API