Legal Opinion

Harr v. Bankers Securities Corp.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 13, 1937No. Appeal, 180PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Parker, J.,

This appeal presents not only a novel but an interesting legal question. Has a corporation, a depositor in a closed bank, a right of set off, by reason of such deposit, in a suit by the receiver of the closed bank to recover dividends declared by the corporate depositor after the closing of the bank on cumulative preferred stock of the corporation owned by the bank when it closed and retained by it thereafter?

The receiver of The Franklin Trust Company of Philadelphia, seeking recovery of a dividend payable in December, 1936, brought an action against the Bankers…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Scott v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Lippitt v. Thames Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1914
  3. Fera v. . WickhamNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. Davis v. Industrial Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
  5. Hibert v. LangSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1895

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. IrvinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  2. In Re Susquehanna Chemical CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Witherow v. WeaverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Christian A. Fisher Building & Loan Association's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  5. Fielis v. Henry H. Edmunds Building & Loan Ass'nSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API