Legal Opinion
Rittenberry v. Lewis
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided February 9, 1965No. 4104PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK W. WILSON, District Judge.
This case is before the Court upon motions for summary judgment filed upon behalf of both the plaintiff and the defendants. The initial motion for summary judgment was filed on behalf of the defendants. It asserts that no genuine issue of fact exists but that the plaintiff was employed by an employer who was not a signatory to the National Bituminous Wage Agreement at the time of the plaintiff’s retirement, and that the plaintiff as a matter of law is therefore not a beneficiary under the United Mine Workers of America Welfare and Retirement Fund of 1950. The…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Smale & Robinson, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1954
- Penello v. International Union, United Mine WorkersDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1950
- Henry County v. Standard Oil Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1934
- American Life Ins. Co. of Alabama v. HutchesonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1940
- Bolgar v. LewisDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1960
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kathleen Moglia v. James GeogheganCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Moglia v. GeogheganDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1967
- Crawford v. CianciulliDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- Smith v. StewartAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1974
- In Re the Arbitration of the Typo-Publishers Outside Tape FundDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1972
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.