Waterworks Industries, Inc. v. Aplex Industries, Inc.
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Concurrence
URBIGKIT, Chief Justice,
specially concurring.
I concur in the decision, the reasoning used and authority cited in substantiation on the issue of the invalidity of the Texas judgment. There is cause to be troubled, however, with the unnecessary and, I believe, erroneous conclusion in the first paragraph of the discussion relating to the non-domestication of a foreign corporation transacting business in the state in contravention of Wyo.Const, art. 10 § 5 and W.S. 17-16-1501 and specifically W.S. 17-16-1502(a). “A foreign corporation may not transact business in this state until it obtains a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Allenberg Cotton Co. v. PittmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Eli Lilly & Co. v. Sav-On-Drugs, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- General Railway Signal Co. v. Virginia Ex Rel. State Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Ford Motor Company v. ArguelloWyoming Supreme Court · 1963
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.