Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Burnham v. Superior Court of Cal., County of Marin

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 29, 1990No. 89-44Published

1Concurrence

Justice Brennan,

with whom Justice Marshall, Justice Blackmun, and Justice O’Connor join, concurring in the judgment.

I agree with Justice Scalia that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment generally permits a state *629court to exercise jurisdiction over a defendant if he is served with process while voluntarily present in the forum State.1 I do not perceive the need, however, to decide that a jurisdictional rule that “ ‘has been immemorially the actual law of the land,’” ante, at 619, quoting Hurtado v. California, 110 U. S. 516, 528 (1884), automatically comports with due process…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  5. Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API