Miller v. Hall
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
CASE 65 — PETITION EQUITY APPEAL FROM HICKMAN CIRCUIT COURT. CITED— 1 Duvall, 202; Commonwealth vs. Roberts. 4 Dana, 98-9; Cleary, SfC., vs. Marshall’s heirs. 10 B. Mon., 449-50. 3 Metcalfe, 455; Earle, SfC., vs. Couch. 9 B. Mon., 228; Debell vs. Foxworthy. CITED— 2 Duvall, 426; Jackson vs. Speed.
1Opinion of the Court
JUDGE WILLIAMS
delivered the opinion oe the court:
Leight, Barrett & Co., and other creditors of W. K. Hall, obtained a decree of the Hickman equity and criminal court, to subject certain real estate and town property, the title of which was in Mrs. Hall, to the payment of their debts, on May 25, 1860.
On the 23d of November following the commssioner’s report was confirmed, it having been filed two days previously.
*231The report shows that the property, pursuant to said decree, was sold July 2, 1860, on credits of six and twelve' months, and that Josiah Brummal bought a portion and the plaintiffs…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- WHITING v. the Bank of the United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Debell v. Foxworthy's heirsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1848
- Clarey v. Marshall's HeirsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1836
- Clark's Heirs v. FarrowCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1850
- Earle v. CouchCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1861
3Cited by6 opinions
- Bullitt v. Eastern Kentucky Land Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1896
- Webb v. Webb's GuardianCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
- Earl v. PorterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1881
- McIntosh v. Clark, Thurmund & RichardsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
- Rankin v. EastinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1881
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.