Legal Opinion

Clark's Heirs v. Farrow

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided September 20, 1850PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to the McCracken Circuit. Bills of Review. Parties. Pendente lite Purchasers,

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Marshall

In October 1842 William Farrow obtained a decree against the heirs of William Clark, which was made final in April 1843, for the specific performance of a contract for the sale of a lot in Paducah by Clark to Farrow, on the payment of a designated balance of the purchase money then unpaid. In July and August 1843, the balance of the money having been paid to the commissioner appointed to make the conveyance, was by him paid to and received by the agent or attorney of Clark’s heirs, who were non-residents of this State; and on the 10th day of August, 1843, the commissioner made the conveyance,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Debell v. Foxworthy's heirsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1848

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Garvin v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Florida · 1892
  2. Yocum v. ForemanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1879
  3. E'Town Shopping Center, Inc. v. Lexington Finance Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1969
  4. Rose v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
  5. Miller v. HallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1866

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API