Legal Opinion

Torres v. American R.

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided July 24, 1946No. 4122PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDGERTON, Circuit Judge.

Appellee railroad paid its employees wages which were less than they were entitled to under the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, §§ 6, 7, 29 U.S.C.A. §§ 206, 207. Appellee afterwards paid them somewhat less than half of the balance due and, on the theory that appellee could pay no-more, the employees executed releases in full. A large number of employees, the present appellants, afterwards brought this suit to recover the amounts which still remained unpaid. The court found that ap-pellee had paid all it could pay “and thereafter continue operations or avoid…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brooklyn Savings Bank v. O'NeilSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. D. A. Schulte, Inc. v. GangiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  3. Fort Smith & Western Railroad v. MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1920

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Allegheny-Ludlum Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  2. Urbino v. Puerto Rico Ry. Light & Power Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1947
  3. James D. Hodgson, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor v. Benton TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1971
  4. 11 Fair empl.prac.cas. 167, 10 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 10,368 United States of America v. Allegheny-Ludlum Industries, Inc., Sidney S. Harris, Intervenors-Appellants, National Organization for Women, Inc., Movants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API