Legal Opinion
Brundidge Banking Co. v. Pike County Agricultural Stabilization & Conservation Committee
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided May 1, 1990No. 89-7072PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MELTON, District Judge:
This appeal from the order of the district court setting a permanent peanut quota on a particular tract of land concerns the scope of judicial review and remedy for an aggrieved party who maintains that the peanut quota applied to the parts of a reconstituted farm was determined erroneously.
A tract of land known as the Ramage Place, situated in Pike County, Alabama, and listed in records of the Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service (“ASCS”) as tract 823, came into the possession of O.K. McDowell, a defendant below who does not join this appeal, by way of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Japan Whaling Ass'n v. American Cetacean SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Patrick Esch v. Clayton K. Yeutter, Secretary, U.S. Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- In Re Joanne G. Burns, Debtor. Joanne G. Burns v. United States of America, Acting by and Through the Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Brundidge Banking Company v. Pike County Agricultural Stabilization And Conservation CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990