Legal Opinion

Brundidge Banking Company v. Pike County Agricultural Stabilization And Conservation Committee

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided May 1, 1990No. 89-7072PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

899 F.2d 1154

BRUNDIDGE BANKING COMPANY; Max C. Sconyers; and Lottie H.

Sconyers, Plaintiffs-Appellees,

v.

PIKE COUNTY AGRICULTURAL STABILIZATION AND CONSERVATION

COMMITTEE, etc., W.O. Hixon; Harold F. Lee; Jim M. Wilson,

all in their official capacities, etc., Joe Stevens, in his

official capacity, etc.; James H. Reeves, etc., et al.,

Defendants-Appellants.

No. 89-7072.

United States Court of Appeals,

Eleventh Circuit.

May 1, 1990.

1

James E. Wilson, U.S. Atty., Montgomery, Ala., Kenneth E. Vines, John F. Cordes, Matthew M. Collette, U.S. Dept. of Labor, Civ. Div., Appellate Section, Washington, D.C., for…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Federal Crop Ins. Corp. v. MerrillSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Heckler v. Community Health Services of Crawford County, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Japan Whaling Ass'n v. American Cetacean SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Patrick Esch v. Clayton K. Yeutter, Secretary, U.S. Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
  5. In Re Joanne G. Burns, Debtor. Joanne G. Burns v. United States of America, Acting by and Through the Internal Revenue ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Tefel v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
  2. Tefel v. RenoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API