Legal Opinion

Oregon Box & Mfg. Co. v. Jones Lumber Co.

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 1926PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, J.

The plaintiffs' contend that the ordinance set out in the amended complaint is exercised under a specific grant of power authorizing the city to legislate in the particular manner set out in Section 448 of said ordinance. Based upon that -premise they claim that the court was without authority to declare the ordinance unreasonable: 2 Mc Quillin, Municipal Corp., 1570, § 724; 2 Dillon (5 ed.), 943, § 600; Cooley on Constitutional Limitations, 201; Darlington v. Ward, 48 S. C. 570 (26 S. E. 906, 38 L. R. A. 326-333 et seq.); City of Baltimore v. Wollman, 123 Md. 310, 319 (91 Atl. 339); Zucht v.…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Welch v. SwaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1909
  2. Atkinson v. Goodrich Transportation Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Peterson v. Standard Oil Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1910
  4. City of St. Louis v. Edward Heitzeberg Packing & Provision Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1897
  5. Winslow v. FleischnerOregon Supreme Court · 1924

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. State v. DennisOregon Supreme Court · 1945
  2. Sullivan v. Mountain States Power Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Silver Falls Timber Co. v. Eastern & Western Lumber Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Hise v. City of North BendOregon Supreme Court · 1931
  5. State of Oregon v. WattsOregon Supreme Court · 1956

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API