Legal Opinion

Osborne v. Arkansas Department of Human Services

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided March 7, 2007No. CA 06-817PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Karen R. Baker, Judge.

Appellant, Glen Osborne, appeals from the termination of his parental rights to his two children, T.O. and D.O. Appellant’s sole argument on appeal is that the trial court erred in terminating his “parental rights by default, and then, in the written order of termination, relying on evidence from prior proceedings which were not incorporated into the termination hearing.” We affirm.

This case began on January 3, 2005, when the Department of Human Services (DHS) removed two children 1 from appellant’s home. A seventy-two-hour hold was placed on the children on January 5,…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Anders v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Linker-Flores v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2004
  4. Linder v. LinderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  5. Davis v. SmithSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1979

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Smith v. Arkansas Department of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2007
  2. Ewasiuk v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
  3. Sills v. Ark. Dep't of Human Servs.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 2018
  4. Tuck v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2008
  5. Thomas v. Arkansas Department of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 2012

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API